DUPIXENT HAS A DEMONSTRATED
SAFETY PROFILE ACROSS ASTHMA
CLINICAL TRIALS

DUPIXENT has been studied up to 1 year in nearly 3000 asthma patients1,a

Adverse reactions occurring in ≥1% of DUPIXENT + SOC patients and at a higher rate than placebo + SOC in DRI12544 and QUEST (6-month safety pool)

DUPIXENT 200 mg
Q2W + SOC

(n=779) n (%)

Injection site
reactionsb

111 (14)

Oropharyngeal
pain

13 (2)

Eosinophiliac

17 (2)

DUPIXENT 300 mg
Q2W + SOC

(n=788)
n (%)

Injection site
reactionsb

144 (18)

Oropharyngeal
pain

19 (2)

Eosinophiliac

16 (2)

PLACEBO + SOC
(n=792)
n (%)

Injection site
reactionsb

50 (6)

Oropharyngeal pain

7 (1)

Eosinophiliac

2 (<1)

aThe asthma development program for patients aged 12 years and older included three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trials (DRI12544, QUEST, and VENTURE) of 24 to 52 weeks in treatment duration, which enrolled a total of 2888 subjects.

bInjection site reactions cluster includes erythema, edema, pruritus, pain, and inflammation.

cNone met the criteria for serious eosinophilic conditions.

  • The safety population (DRI12544 and QUEST) was 12-87 years of age, of which 63% were female and 82% were White. DUPIXENT 200 mg or 300 mg was administered subcutaneously Q2W, following an initial dose of 400 mg or 600 mg, respectively
  • In DRI12544 and QUEST, the proportion of subjects who discontinued treatment due to adverse events was 4% of the placebo + SOC group, 3% of the DUPIXENT 200 mg Q2W + SOC group, and 6% of the DUPIXENT 300 mg Q2W + SOC group

OLE, open-label extension; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SOC, standard of care.

DUPIXENT demonstrated safety data in asthma patients requiring OCS2

Adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients in either group in VENTUREd

DUPIXENT 300 mg Q2W + SOC
(n=103) n (%)

Viral upper respiratory
tract infection

9 (9)

Bronchitis

7 (7)

Sinusitis

7 (7)

Influenza

3 (3)

Eosinophiliae

14 (14)

Injection site reactionf

9 (9)

≥1 measurement of blood
eosinophil count >3000 cells/μL

13 (13)

PLACEBO + SOC (n=107) n (%)

ADVERSE EVENT
Viral upper respiratory
tract infection

19 (18)

Bronchitis

6 (6)

Sinusitis

4 (4)

Influenza

6 (6)

Eosinophiliae

1 (1)

Injection site reactionf

4 (4)

≥1 measurement of blood
eosinophil count >3000 cells/μL

1 (1)

dAdverse events in this category were reported according to preferred terms in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 20.0.

eThe adverse event of eosinophilia in this table is a combination of the preferred items of eosinophil count increase (in 7% of the patients in the DUPIXENT group vs no patients in the placebo group) and eosinophilia (7% vs 1%).

fInjection site reaction is a high-level term in MedDRA.

  • The safety population (VENTURE) included all patients who received at least 1 dose or a partial dose
    of DUPIXENT or placebo; data were analyzed according to the regimen received

OCS, oral corticosteroid; OLE, open-label extension; Q2W, once every 2 weeks;
SOC, standard of care.

TRAVERSE demonstrated a long-term safety profile through ~3 years3,4

TEAEs occurring in ≥10% in any treatment group during the OLE period4

Patients enrolled
from DRI12544
DUPIXENT/DUPIXENT
(n=421)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 109 (26)
Bronchitis 80 (19)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
60 (14)
Influenza 45 (11)
Pharyngitis 37 (9)
Headache 47 (11)
Injection site
erythema
55 (13)
Injection site
pruritus
16 (4)
Patients enrolled
from DRI12544
PLACEBO/DUPIXENT
(n=111)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 27 (24)
Bronchitis 15 (14)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
18 (16)
Influenza 5 (5)
Pharyngitis 16 (14)
Headache 13 (12)
Injection site
erythema
26 (23)
Injection site
pruritus
12 (11)
Patients enrolled
from QUEST
DUPIXENT/DUPIXENT
(n=1013)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 191 (19)
Bronchitis 118 (12)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
130 (13)
Influenza 69 (7)
Pharyngitis 59 (6)
Headache 74 (7)
Injection site
erythema
50 (5)
Injection site
pruritus
7 (1)
Patients enrolled
from QUEST
PLACEBO/DUPIXENT
(n=517)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 99 (19)
Bronchitis 63 (12)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
65 (13)
Influenza 30 (6)
Pharyngitis 26 (5)
Headache 47 (9)
Injection site
erythema
35 (7)
Injection site
pruritus
15 (3)
Patients enrolled
from VENTURE
DUPIXENT/DUPIXENT
(n=90)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 16 (18)
Bronchitis 14 (16)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
6 (7)
Influenza 7 (8)
Pharyngitis 4 (4)
Headache 5 (6)
Injection site
erythema
2 (2)
Injection site
pruritus
0
Patients enrolled
from VENTURE
PLACEBO/DUPIXENT
(n=97)
n (%)
TEAEs
Nasopharyngitis 17 (18)
Bronchitis 9 (9)
Upper respiratory
tract infection
8 (8)
Influenza 9 (9)
Pharyngitis 1 (1)
Headache 4 (4)
Injection site
erythema
5 (5)
Injection site
pruritus
2 (2)
  • Other TEAEs occurred in ≥1% in any treatment group in TRAVERSE, including but not limited to oropharyngeal pain and eosinophilia3

Primary endpoint results: 86% of patients enrolled from DRI12544, 79% of patients enrolled from QUEST, and 77% of patients enrolled from VENTURE experienced at least one TEAE up to Week 96 of the OLE period.3

  • In DRI12544 and QUEST, the adverse reactions that occurred at a rate of at least 1% in subjects treated with DUPIXENT and at a higher rate than in their respective comparator groups were injection site reactions, oropharyngeal pain, and eosinophilia (6-month safety pool)1

Long-term safety profile was consistent with that seen
in the placebo-controlled parent studies3,4

OLE, open-label extension; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

Explore the complete study designs