Skip to main content

STUDY DESIGNS

DUPIXENT + TRIPLE THERAPY
WAS COMPARED TO
PLACEBO + TRIPLE THERAPY1,2,a

Not actual
DUPIXENT patients.

Not actual
DUPIXENT patients.

Two phase 3 trials
with over 1800 patients in total evaluated the efficacy of DUPIXENT + triple
therapy
administered every 2
weeks in patients with
inadequately controlled COPD and an eosinophilic phenotype

Triple therapy consisted of LAMA+LABA+ICS.1

BOREAS and NOTUS clinical study designs

Screening
Randomized
Treatment period:
52 weeks
DUPIXENT
SC 300 mg Q2W + triple
therapy
Placebo
SC Q2W + triple therapy
Follow-up
Week -4 Baseline Week 52 Week 64
 
Primary
endpoint2,3
Week 52 Annualized rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations
Select
Secondary
endpoints2,3
Week 12
Week 52
Change in lung function (pre-bronchodilator FEV1) from baseline
Week 52 Change in SGRQ total score from baseline
Week 52 Percentage of patients with SGRQ total score improvement of ≥4 points

a1874 patients were enrolled in the BOREAS (N=939) and NOTUS (N=935) trials.1

b98% received LAMA+LABA+ICS in BOREAS and 99% in NOTUS.1

DUPIXENT trials included a broad population of patients with inadequately controlled COPD

Select Inclusion Criteria2,3

BACKGROUND THERAPY
Background triple therapy (LAMA+LABA+ICS) for 3 months prior to randomization with a stable dose of medication for ≥1 month prior to Visit 1; double therapy (LAMA+LABA) allowed if an ICS was contraindicated

EXACERBATION HISTORY
≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbations within the year prior to screening, ≥1 exacerbation while the patient was on triple therapy

BIOMARKER OF TYPE 2 INFLAMMATION
Blood EOS levels ≥300 cells/µL

Smoking status
Current or former smokers with a smoking history of ≥10 pack-years

PRODUCTIVE COUGH
Symptoms of chronic productive cough for at least 3 months in the past year

LUNG FUNCTION
Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7 and post-bronchodilator FEV1 of 30% to 70% predicted

Select EXCLUSION Criteria2,3

ASTHMA HISTORY
Patients with a history of asthma were excluded from the trials

Patient characteristics at baseline1

40% of patients had blood EOS
<300 cells/µL at baseline. Blood EOS
levels fluctuate frequently4,5

BOREAS
N=939

-
Emphysema (%)
32.6
Mean age (years) (± SD)
65.1 (8.1)
Male (%)
66.0
White (%)
84.1
Mean smoking history
(pack-years) (± SD)
40.5 (23.4)
Current smokers (%)
30
Mean number of moderate or
severe exacerbations in
previous year (± SD)c
2.3 (1.0)
Background COPD medications
at randomization:
ICS/LAMA/LABA (%)
97.6
Mean percent predicted
post-bronchodilator FEV1
(%) (± SD)
50.6 (13.1)
Mean SGRQ total score (± SD)
48.4 (17.4)
Mean baseline blood
eosinophil count (cells/µL) (± SD)
401 (298)

NOTUS
N=935

+

cModerate exacerbations were exacerbations that resulted in treatment with a systemic glucocorticoid, an antibiotic agent, or both. Severe exacerbations were exacerbations that led to hospitalization or an emergency medical care visit or that resulted in death.1-3

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EOS, eosinophil; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting beta agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; SC, subcutaneous; SD, standard deviation; SGRQ, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.

Learn more about the efficacy and safety data

DISCOVER EFFICACY DATA EXPLORE SAFETY DATA