Results are descriptive in the extended
active treatment period at Week 52. Definitive conclusions cannot be made due to
limitations
associated with extended active treatment design,
including lack of
comparator arm and decreasing sample size.3
DEMONSTRATED GREATER HISTOLOGIC IMPROVEMENTS IN CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 1 YEAR1,3
Histologic improvements were observed at Weeks 16 and 52 with DUPIXENT1,3
Histologic Remission1,3
(≤6 EOS/HPF peak esophageal
intraepithelial
EOS count)
Histologic Response1,3
(<15 EOS/HPF peak esophageal
intraepithelial
EOS count)
Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count
Used to confirm diagnosis and determine treatment response. Histologic data are reported as the percentage of patients achieving the defined EOS threshold.4VISIBLE IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ESOPHAGUS WERE OBSERVED3
Improvements in EREFS total scores were observed at Weeks 16 and 52 with DUPIXENT3
Reduction in EREFS
total
score3,c
Thresholds for clinically meaningful changes in EREFS scores have not been established.
Results
are descriptive in the extended active
treatment period at Week 52.
Definitive conclusions
cannot be made due to limitations associated with extended active treatment design,
including
lack of comparator arm and decreasing sample size.3
cReductions indicate improvements in score.3
Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS)
EREFS is a clinician-reported rating of the severity of 5 endoscopic features: edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture.5DECREASES IN SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED BY CAREGIVERS1,3,d
Decrease in the number of days with ≥1 sign or symptom of EoE via LSM change in PESQ‑C1,3,d
Definitive conclusions cannot be made. Numerical improvements were observed at Week 16 and maintained for 52 weeks. Results are descriptive at Week 52 due to limitations associated with extended active treatment design, including lack of comparator arm and decreasing sample size3
dBaseline PESQ-C was 0.43 (6.0 days) in the DUPIXENT arm and 0.49 (6.9 days) in the placebo arm. Days are out of a 14-day period.3